3 ms·
Can't a tech firm running a "legal gpt" have an insurance?
by kulikalov 3y ago
Can't a tech firm running a "legal gpt" have an insurance?
- toomuchtodo 3y agoDo they have a license to practice law?
- giantg2 3y agoNo. Malpractice insurance would be at the professional level. There could be lawyers using a legal chatGTP, but the professional liabilities would still be with the licensed professional.
- kulikalov 3y agoWell, I guess since it's not "practice" we gonna call it "mal-inference insurance".
- freejazz 3y agoMore legal malpractice? No, because they aren't attorneys and you cannot rely upon them for legal advice such that they'd be liable to you for providing subpar legal advice.
- kulikalov 3y agoWhy? Because there's no word for "insurance of AI advise accuracy"? The whole point of progress is that we create something that is not a thing at the moment.
- freejazz 3y agoNo, because, like I said, GPTs are not legally allowed to represent individuals, so they cannot obtain malpractice insurance. You can make up an entirely ancillary kind of insurance. It does not change the fact that GPTs are not legally allowed to represent clients, so they cannot be liable to clients for legal advice. Seeing as how you think GPTs are so useful here... why are you asking me these questions when a GPT should be perfectly capable of providing you with the policy considerations that underline attorney licensing procedures.
- giantg2 3y agoThat was the point of my comment - no ability to collect the insurance.