3 ms·
Then make the connection between racism and damages to a company relevant to the discussion, or being thin-skinned and the same. There is zero evidence that El
by rpmisms 3y ago
Then make the connection between racism and damages to a company relevant to the discussion, or being thin-skinned and the same.
There is zero evidence that Elon profited off the emerald mine his dad bought shares in, and the allegation is that he conspired to hide that money somehow. It's a normal definition of conspiracy.
- Dylan16807 3y ago> Then make the connection between racism and damages to a company relevant to the discussion, or being thin-skinned and the same. They both have obvious consequences in a leadership position. Obvious consequences are enough. > There is zero evidence that Elon profited off the emerald mine his dad bought shares in, and the allegation is that he conspired to hide that money somehow. It's a normal definition of conspiracy. 1. I have never heard this "hiding money" part of it so I don't think that's the crux of it. 2. "Some guy hid his own money" is not a conspiracy. This is baffling.
- rpmisms 3y ago> Obvious consequences are enough. Obvious potential consequences are not enough. This is the richest man in the world, surely you have an example.
- Dylan16807 3y agoWhat does being rich have to do with it? It's hard for someone outside a company to point to a direct consequence of racism in the company leadership. That doesn't make it not-bad for the leadership to be racist. Surely you're not saying it's okay to discriminate as CEO if you make enough money. And if you want a consequence of being thin-skinned, uh, anything to do with twitter? Half his interactions with the SEC?