4 ms·
this is much cheaper than S3 glacier. Any explanation on how to keep data safe?
by redskyluan 3y ago
this is much cheaper than S3 glacier.
Any explanation on how to keep data safe?
- jqpabc123 3y agoAny explanation on how to keep data safe? Start by not using an unknown provider with questionable reliability or stability where the only contact is an email address.
- StopTheTechies 3y agoI think you're forgetting the cost parameter—obviously no provider can guarantee either reliability or stability
- manuelabeledo 3y agoThey can and they do - and if they fail, they cover damages.
- fulafel 3y agoIs there a provider that would cover the customer's damages like interruption of business? There are some insurance companies at least that do similar things.
- Fnoord 3y agoA SLA would. I would just use multiple backups. One self-hosted on-premise and two off-site. Then the two off-site can have egress costs. Wouldn't matter. The self-hosted one would be the primary one to backup from. And it is going to be solid, usually. For example, a Synology NAS would suffice.
- fulafel 3y agoI think nearly all SLAs just give you discounts on the service's bill. Eg if your service vendor costs you 1000/month and they have a 10-day outage and you lose 10000000, they will credit you 1000 best-case, or maybe 1/3 of that (since it was up most of the month).
- logifail 3y ago> if they fail, they cover damages Umm, most providers' standard T&Cs exclude liability for indirect or consequential loss following unavailability of their service.
- StopTheTechies 3y agoI'm sorry, S3 insures your data in case of loss? How come they don't ask the value of what you're storing then?
- jzombie 3y agoI'd rather pay a little more money to a reputable vendor, honestly. If I depend on the backup, I want a reasonable guarantee they will deliver on their promise.
- _ubn7 3y agoWe keep 3 copies of your data - two on LTO drives (across two different locations) and one on enterprise grade hard drives.
- ahofmann 3y agoHow is this much cheaper? S3 glacier deep archive costs 0,00099 € per GB and month.
- mackman 3y agoI have a fairly optimized backup to glacier strategy involving a couple of days of soak time in S3 before moving to glacier with lifecycle rules to avoid the 180 day min storage for transient files. Net I end up paying about $1.20 to $1.50 per TB per month. Restoration of my data set would cost around $100/TB though. So a straight $1/TB would be a nice savings on a good month, and a great savings if my house ever burns down and I need to restore.
- dorfsmay 3y agoBackblaze is 6$/TB/month with no egress fee, and are a well established company with a good reputation: https://www.backblaze.com/cloud-storage/pricing https://www.backblaze.com/cloud-storage/pricing I'm surprised the don't come up more in a discussion about backup storage.
- lakpan 3y agoIt doesn’t? From my experience it comes up every time S3 is mentioned, except maybe recently Cloudflare took the spotlight.
- gruez 3y agoThat has retrieval fees as well as minimum storage times.
- lelag 3y agoNo egress fees make a huge cost difference if you ever need your archived data back.
- AtlasBarfed 3y agoDid it ever get revealed how glacier works? I had heard they were using DVD-Rs back in the day, but that was a decade ago and a big price drop. https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-cost-per-gigabyte/ https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-cost-per-gigabyte/ I know the link is LTO based for some of it. Is LTO really cheaper than hard drives? Or is it just that LTO has automation equipment behind it? It's interesting to me that hard drives have dropped 56% in cost since 2017, and yet I don't think storage prices have dropped anything like that. Per the article, it's because demand allows them to keep it high. I welcome a price war! And thanks for the honesty Backblaze.