I don't super understand your point. I understood TFA to making the argument that dealing with the low-level business of stuff like mutexes and async/await isn'

I don't super understand your point. I understood TFA to making the argument that dealing with the low-level business of stuff like mutexes and async/await isn't what most people want to do: > We should aspire not to simplify the system by hiding the differences between futures and threads, but instead to find the right set of APIs and language features that build on the affordances of futures to make more kinds of engineering achievable than before. The stuff you listed, along with async/await, makes this possible. Isn't that what TFA is saying?