3 ms·
Yes, but the portable GUI frameworks by Microsoft themselves are generally not very good, and they tend to be abandoned after a couple of years. Avalonia is de
by jiggawatts 3y ago
Yes, but the portable GUI frameworks by Microsoft themselves are generally not very good, and they tend to be abandoned after a couple of years.
Avalonia is developed outside of the Microsoft corporate madness and seems to be slowly becoming the defacto cross-platform framework because it is expected to last a bit longer than a manager's attention span: https://avaloniaui.net/ https://avaloniaui.net/
- FirmwareBurner 3y agoThat's rich considering that many of the new Windows apps shipped out of the box with Windows 11 are web based and use some sort of Edge based Electron-like container.
- wvenable 3y agoMost new Microsoft apps are actual web apps that run a browser and then on the desktop they're just the same app in an Edge-Electron-like container.
- reactordev 3y agoI think that corroborates that GUI development on .net is a mess and the only common framework out there that can solve the “do it once on all the things” is Avalonia. Web-based electron apps are not .net apps and that’s what we are talking about here.
- justin66 3y agoHow does what you're talking about suggest the parent comment is "rich?"
- FirmwareBurner 3y agoI'm saying Microsoft's actions are rich, not his comment.
- DANmode 3y agoRelying on Microsoft for UI is like relying on the Smithsonian to DJ your party. They do a great job. Just...not at that.