That's some mid level whataboutism. > the Internet's arbiter of "truthiness" for too long. That's funny how you use a word made popular by Stephen Colbert. W

That's some mid level whataboutism. > the Internet's arbiter of "truthiness" for too long. That's funny how you use a word made popular by Stephen Colbert. Wikipedia is fine. We are not "stuck" with wikipedia, there are alternatives. Wikipedia is a free source of information, with certain rules. It is good enough. > highly politicized You cannot reach perfect objectivity or neutrality. Wikipedia depends on sources. People who attack wikipedia often sound like they have an agenda.