Are you thinking about something specific? What's the scenario where the public harm to a usage control bypass becomes more valuable to an attacker than the bu

Are you thinking about something specific? What's the scenario where the public harm to a usage control bypass becomes more valuable to an attacker than the bug bounty? (Edit: <sigh> than the bug bounty that the linked author desires. Really?) Remember that both of these technologies don't allow the device to do anything it isn't able to do in its default configuration. They're essentially a form of DRM: disallowing otherwise useful activities because of the desires of the owner (and not the user). Would you demand, say, Apple pay a bug bounty for a DRM bypass that let people rip Netflix videos? Probably not, right?