3 ms·
Whatever the free one last year was. I have not played with it too much lately. Probably 3.5?
by rietta 3y ago
Whatever the free one last year was. I have not played with it too much lately. Probably 3.5?
- dmd 3y ago3.5 is absolute garbage. It is puzzling to me that OpenAI continues to make it available, simply because of the reputational damage.
- asenna 3y agoI was wondering the same thing! The number of people I've had to explain to "get the premium version, do not judge it based on GPT3.5!"
- lukan 3y ago"It is puzzling to me that OpenAI continues to make it available, simply because of the reputational damage." "reputational damage"? You might live in a bubble. I think most people use 3.5 with joy for free. For my (programming) tasks it is also only slightly more useful. So much that I sometimes subscribe to get the higher quality, but for the occasional question 3.5 is enough. And if 3.5 is not able at all, because the question is too tough, then 4 seldom is capable either in my experience.
- jcul 3y agoI find it very useful. I'm not asking it to write code for me or anything. More like a quick way to look up syntax or flags for obscure programs I don't use too often.
- p1esk 3y agoIf you like playing with LLMs, $20/mo for GPT4 is definitely worth it.
- nomel 3y agoAPI access, which is pay as you go, is much cheaper if you just want to just play around. If I'm not using plugins, I genuinely prefer playground.openai.com to chat.openai.com, because I can modify messages. I've found that any time ChatGPT gets something wrong, that wrongness is stuck it the context, and screws things up.