2 ms·
Sure, but when you double the acceptable transportation budget/distance, you square the coverage territory. (Assuming an infinite number of routes and no chang
by Scoundreller 3y ago
Sure, but when you double the acceptable transportation budget/distance, you square the coverage territory.
(Assuming an infinite number of routes and no change in cost per distance)
- maxglute 3y agoI think, unqualified speculation, transportation cost scales linearly because most economical exploitation past shores is along river/waterway sand, hence exploitation will be not be squared. Squaring coverage territory, as in getting sand from land introduces land shipping, which is even less efficient because cost per distance is subject to geography. Unless, engineered sand comes from coastal infra that takes regional inputs and pipes it strait onto barges, which also makes sense. But wild speculation on my part.