> They're in a strategic dead end, the reasons to pick Firefox are very slim. This is such a wrong statement and has nothing to back it up. Why is it first. F

> They're in a strategic dead end, the reasons to pick Firefox are very slim. This is such a wrong statement and has nothing to back it up. Why is it first. Firefox has: - much higher customization options (huge) - different features such as multi account containers - a different profit model not based on ads and intrusion. Mozilla is not acting like a monopoly and trying to force people to watch their ads. - A different engine. - a better strategy for Ram - a different UI - and much more. Some of us, have enjoyed Firefox for aged and will keep doing so. We're power users and not people who act like popularity due to external marketing capabilities and default pushing is reason enough to say "other browsers should not be relevant". Wtf is your comment, honestly. Now, if you want to talk about Mozilla missing their money for US culture wars (Rep vs Dem) and issues unrelated to tech, then i agree. But technology wise, Firefox is a very easy case to make.