5 ms·

What about aluminium?

• vehemenz 3y ago
  Yeah, that's kind of the flaw in this argument. The main conclusion is basically correct, but steel rusts and aluminum doesn't. Plus aluminum is light enough to warrant upgrading over steel, and it barely costs anything more.
  • Gualdrapo 3y ago
    Stainless steel does not rust too (maybe it does Zig?) but if I recall correctly the con about it is that it's a bit heavier than "normal" steel. Still I'd love to have a classic-ish stainless steel bike with disc brakes.
• BozeWolf 3y ago
  Aluminium generally is stiff, quite uncomfortable for longer rides (100km). I own one, had a lot of fun with it. Now I have a carbon road bike, don’t care about the weight, did care about comfort. Comfortable, flexible, but still has stiffness in the right direction (torsion is way less). Longer rides are much more pleasant. There are also nice titanium bikes and steel bikes. From what I heard titanium and steel frames tend to be a bit more flexible, no idea why.
  • drunner 3y ago
    This is one of those things that doesn't make any sense. The amount of vertical deflection difference between aluminium and carbon is nothing, tires make the biggest difference by far. Yet many people will say carbon is more 'comfortable'. Its hard to tell how much placebo it is.
    • BozeWolf 3y ago
      Running the same tires... same rims. Of course it is a complicated system, so you can never compare it 1:1. Fact is that carbon bikes tend to ride more comfortable, if they are designed for it. Also the frame can be shaped and put together to flex in the right directions, which is harder with aluminium. Then again, there are also endurance bikes (many 1000s of km's a week) made from titanium (J. Guillem) which are comfortable and also have much simpler shapes than carbon frames.