4 ms·
The cost of not having a reliable supply chain is much more than they're paying their drivers. It's just good economics to pay more to reduce driver turnover.
by eschneider 3y ago
The cost of not having a reliable supply chain is much more than they're paying their drivers. It's just good economics to pay more to reduce driver turnover.
- manicennui 3y agoProbably takes away a lot of drivers from their competitors too.
- savanaly 3y agoWhy is it not good economics for their competitors to do so as well?
- hanniabu 3y agoLess scale, easier to fill gaps, less impact
- adventured 3y agoWalmart has basically always been superior to its competitors at logistics. It has been one of their key competitive advantages for many decades. They have been a data monster heavily focused on logistics for most of their existence (I've been reading about their various logistics advantages for 30 years now). Even if doing a thing is good for a competitor, that obviously doesn't mean that competitor will do said logical thing. Companies fail all the time because they're incompetent in one form or another (or many forms).