3 ms·
Such a response would generally be a crime; existing cybercrime legislation generally does not have any clauses permitting retaliation as "self defence", and al
by PeterisP 3y ago
Such a response would generally be a crime; existing cybercrime legislation generally does not have any clauses permitting retaliation as "self defence", and also very often you'd be DDoSing an innocent third party, another victim whose compromised device is abused to route traffic, and also affecting their neighbors on the same network.
- urbandw311er 3y agoFair point, I hadn’t considered that. Perhaps it might encourage people to keep their systems patched if the outcome of not doing so was being Ddos’d!