3 ms·
Just like defamation can be punished, you can target the sharing of explicit pictures intending to cause harm or shame If you undress someone in your head that
by foogazi 3y ago
Just like defamation can be punished, you can target the sharing of explicit pictures intending to cause harm or shame
If you undress someone in your head that’s private but you don’t have the right paint, photograph or generate and share it in public
- seanmcdirmid 3y agoWait. Let’s say you are an artist who can paint by hand, and you paint a nude of someone using your imagination, is that actually illegal? Assuming a western jurisdiction, I assume there might be a lot of variation here.
- foogazi 3y agopeople legitimately practice painting nudes from images or models all the time The problem comes with dissemination and intent. Paint a nude and share it on your art website, ok - post it on the school’s chat group and send it to the models friends and family after you breakup ? Not ok
- seanmcdirmid 3y agoEthically or legally? I guess I get that it might not be right, and probably against a lot of TOSes, but I don't see how criminal or even civil law would come into play here.
- HarryHirsch 3y agoMany legal systems know about personality rights. They may be bad for business but are generally a good idea.
- serf 3y ago>Paint a nude and share it on your art website, ok - post it on the school’s chat group and send it to the models friends and family after you breakup ? Not ok I'm not familiar with that social precedent being set. Plenty of nude paints/statues/etc were made posthumously, and tons of them are now permanent monuments in public museums. Few gave permission, but we as a society seem to think that's okay given our widespread dissemination of the art. also the motivation matters : these works weren't made for reasons of malice, generally speaking.