4 ms·
At least with an AI-based system, it's presumably consistent across performances & devices and can be used during training. While not "objective" per se, it's
by beambot 3y ago
At least with an AI-based system, it's presumably consistent across performances & devices and can be used during training. While not "objective" per se, it's certainly better than an human judge that is none of these things.
- dimitrios1 3y agoThe concept of judging has always included some form of bias. There is no such thing as an impartial judge. AI won't change this, it will just include a different set of biases. I'd rather be judged by a human than a machine.
- thfuran 3y ago>it will just include a different set of biases One that many people who would admit the possibility in a human judge will likely insist cannot be present.
- pfisherman 3y ago> Consistent across performances and devices LOL! I think the assumption that an ML system would be robust across these contexts is not well founded. Things as innocuous as the lighting, background, or placement of athletic tape could easily wreck a model like this. The thing about human judges is that the modes of failure are pretty well known at this point; and human perception and visual processing is pretty robust to perturbation.