4 ms·

Mainland-born Chinese here. Xiaomi basically killed Shanzhai smartphones (the sector of all Shanzhai techs chosen by the OP) by releasing Xiaomi (and later Red

by tslmy 3y ago

Mainland-born Chinese here. Xiaomi basically killed Shanzhai smartphones (the sector of all Shanzhai techs chosen by the OP) by releasing Xiaomi (and later Redmi) smartphones. Xiaomi made Android smartphones affordable. How affordable? Here's a clip of the debut event of Xiaomi's first smartphone back in 2011: https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Xx411v7XX/ https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Xx411v7XX/ Scrub to 01:54. That's a table of the flagship smartphones at that time. The last column of the table is the price in CNY. 3k, 4k, 5k -- around that range. Now scrub to 03:20 where their CEO announced the MSRP. Listen to that 30-second-long "wow". Look at that price. The astonishment was real. That's the price range of Shanzhai smartphones. On a flagship-spec'd smartphone. That's monumental in the history of smartphone evolution in China. Ask any friend of yours born & raised in mainland China. I bet none would argue otherwise. --- Disclaimer: I moved to the US in 2017, and my experience since then with tech trends in China has been scarce.

seanmcdirmid 3y ago
The Shanzhai movement was also mostly based on pirated WinCE and the MediaTek all in one chip. After that became outdated (Android replaced WinCE, MediaTek lots its commodity advantage), they really didn't have much of a chance (I don't remember seeing many Android Shanzhai phones, but then I wasn't really paying attention back then). A lot of the design team (almost all Chinese) I worked with at Microsoft China 07-09 moved over to Xiaomi to help found their UX design team (I see one is now a UX director at xiaomi, he was an intern in 2007), which I found pretty cool. They had previously done a lot of Windows Mobile work, and were really committed to trying out some of their wilder designs.
- tslmy 3y ago
  Oh yes, thanks for bringing up the pre-Android-era Shanzhai phones. Were they on WinCE? I was too young to get my hands on one for any first-hand experience. They were... creative!
  - seanmcdirmid 3y ago
    They were almost all on pirated WinCE, not even windows mobile. It might have been all pirated WinCE, but an open sourced Android obviously killed all of that (circa 2010? I don’t remember exact dates but I had a friend working as an engineering manager on the Kin team who talked about it a lot at lunch).
    - tslmy 3y ago
      Would you be able to spare some time and find us some references here? Despite a native Chinese speaker, I can't seem to gather up the correct terms on baidu.com google.com to get me relevant materials on that pre-Android-era mobile OSes.
      - seanmcdirmid 3y ago
        See the comment cousin of yours. I didn’t find much, and what I did find was mostly stuck in PDFs. Edit: here is one article discussing a specific Shanzhai phone. https://drprem.com/tech/cect-t32-apple-cant-approve-this-clone/ https://drprem.com/tech/cect-t32-apple-cant-approve-this-clo... I’m pretty sure it’s Windows CE and not WinMo, most reviewers weren’t concerned about the difference. WinCE was the core of WinMo (well, until windows phone), but it was easier to just take winCE and skin it since they didn’t really want the WinMo UI (this phone has an iPhone copycat UX). Here is another one with WinCE listed as the OS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meizu_M8 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meizu_M8
        tslmy 3y ago
        Learning everyday!
- numpad0 3y ago
  Pirated WinCE?? Do you have any source that those MediaTek software were CE based? I thought they were something more primitive, something like FreeRTOS.
  - seanmcdirmid 3y ago
    Just that I heard at the time when I was working at Microsoft in China. You can probably google up the terms for sources; eg https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/shanzhai-ji-all-you-need-to-know-about-fake-phones/ https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/shanzhai-ji-all-you-need-to... > Part of the reason for this is the low investment in new technology by Shanzhai phone makers and their dependence on cheap and freely available chipsets from companies like MediaTek and Huawei running pirated operating systems, like Windows Mobile. Industry analysts believe the near future won't deliver a dramatic improvement of the usability of the pirate phones. There really was no other option before android came out, since Symbian was never pirated (I think).
    - numpad0 3y ago
      I think something must have been lost in translation then, most Shanzhai phones were heavily modified and skinned featurephones, not smartphones. If that was understanding within MS China, I wonder whether that had an impact on MS' strategic decisions - whether they thought CE/WM has great market penetration in China and required changes from existing platform to WP is minimal... 1: https://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=165&t=1691816 https://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=165&t=1691816 2: https://ascii.jp/elem/000/000/963/963878/img.html https://ascii.jp/elem/000/000/963/963878/img.html
      - seanmcdirmid 3y ago
        I’m not sure what a heavily skinned feature phone OS would have been at the time, maybe Symbian. It was easier to take the mediatek chip and throw WinCE on whatever, even if you didn’t add many smart phone features. It definitely made for a lot of jokes, but I don’t think the executives, at least on the MS china side where I was working, took it as a good omen at all. These were junk phones, and the iPhone at the time clearly wasn’t junk. That WinMo was shortly thereafter abandoned makes me think Redmond thought so as well. Microsoft also locked down WP, so it wasn’t pirate-able, and since Android was already out a couple of years later when Wp was done and was basically free (no need to pirate!), well, everyone lost interest in whatever Microsoft was doing with mobile.
AlchemistCamp 3y ago
I didn't grow up in China, but had a Redmi 3 several years ago and can attest that the price was just too good to beat. Unlike the phone I bought in China back in 2011, the Redmi had a nice UI and felt like the closest thing to an iPhone of any Android I'd used at that point.

by tslmy 3y ago

seanmcdirmid 3y ago

The Shanzhai movement was also mostly based on pirated WinCE and the MediaTek all in one chip. After that became outdated (Android replaced WinCE, MediaTek lots its commodity advantage), they really didn't have much of a chance (I don't remember seeing many Android Shanzhai phones, but then I wasn't really paying attention back then). A lot of the design team (almost all Chinese) I worked with at Microsoft China 07-09 moved over to Xiaomi to help found their UX design team (I see one is now a UX director at xiaomi, he was an intern in 2007), which I found pretty cool. They had previously done a lot of Windows Mobile work, and were really committed to trying out some of their wilder designs.

tslmy 3y ago
Oh yes, thanks for bringing up the pre-Android-era Shanzhai phones. Were they on WinCE? I was too young to get my hands on one for any first-hand experience. They were... creative!
- seanmcdirmid 3y ago
  They were almost all on pirated WinCE, not even windows mobile. It might have been all pirated WinCE, but an open sourced Android obviously killed all of that (circa 2010? I don’t remember exact dates but I had a friend working as an engineering manager on the Kin team who talked about it a lot at lunch).
  - tslmy 3y ago
    Would you be able to spare some time and find us some references here? Despite a native Chinese speaker, I can't seem to gather up the correct terms on baidu.com google.com to get me relevant materials on that pre-Android-era mobile OSes.
    - seanmcdirmid 3y ago
      See the comment cousin of yours. I didn’t find much, and what I did find was mostly stuck in PDFs. Edit: here is one article discussing a specific Shanzhai phone. https://drprem.com/tech/cect-t32-apple-cant-approve-this-clone/ https://drprem.com/tech/cect-t32-apple-cant-approve-this-clo... I’m pretty sure it’s Windows CE and not WinMo, most reviewers weren’t concerned about the difference. WinCE was the core of WinMo (well, until windows phone), but it was easier to just take winCE and skin it since they didn’t really want the WinMo UI (this phone has an iPhone copycat UX). Here is another one with WinCE listed as the OS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meizu_M8 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meizu_M8
      - tslmy 3y ago
        Learning everyday!
numpad0 3y ago
Pirated WinCE?? Do you have any source that those MediaTek software were CE based? I thought they were something more primitive, something like FreeRTOS.
- seanmcdirmid 3y ago
  Just that I heard at the time when I was working at Microsoft in China. You can probably google up the terms for sources; eg https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/shanzhai-ji-all-you-need-to-know-about-fake-phones/ https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/shanzhai-ji-all-you-need-to... > Part of the reason for this is the low investment in new technology by Shanzhai phone makers and their dependence on cheap and freely available chipsets from companies like MediaTek and Huawei running pirated operating systems, like Windows Mobile. Industry analysts believe the near future won't deliver a dramatic improvement of the usability of the pirate phones. There really was no other option before android came out, since Symbian was never pirated (I think).
  - numpad0 3y ago
    I think something must have been lost in translation then, most Shanzhai phones were heavily modified and skinned featurephones, not smartphones. If that was understanding within MS China, I wonder whether that had an impact on MS' strategic decisions - whether they thought CE/WM has great market penetration in China and required changes from existing platform to WP is minimal... 1: https://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=165&t=1691816 https://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=165&t=1691816 2: https://ascii.jp/elem/000/000/963/963878/img.html https://ascii.jp/elem/000/000/963/963878/img.html
    - seanmcdirmid 3y ago
      I’m not sure what a heavily skinned feature phone OS would have been at the time, maybe Symbian. It was easier to take the mediatek chip and throw WinCE on whatever, even if you didn’t add many smart phone features. It definitely made for a lot of jokes, but I don’t think the executives, at least on the MS china side where I was working, took it as a good omen at all. These were junk phones, and the iPhone at the time clearly wasn’t junk. That WinMo was shortly thereafter abandoned makes me think Redmond thought so as well. Microsoft also locked down WP, so it wasn’t pirate-able, and since Android was already out a couple of years later when Wp was done and was basically free (no need to pirate!), well, everyone lost interest in whatever Microsoft was doing with mobile.

AlchemistCamp 3y ago

I didn't grow up in China, but had a Redmi 3 several years ago and can attest that the price was just too good to beat. Unlike the phone I bought in China back in 2011, the Redmi had a nice UI and felt like the closest thing to an iPhone of any Android I'd used at that point.