3 ms·
You haven't described any aspect of filming you that forces you to do something, yet still maintain a right to use force against those who film in public.
by ETH_start 3y ago
You haven't described any aspect of filming you that forces you to do something, yet still maintain a right to use force against those who film in public.
- g-b-r 3y agoYou can't see how you're forced to constrain your behavior if you're going on YouTube? (assuming you were presentable to begin with)
- ETH_start 3y agoNope, not forced
- InvertedRhodium 3y agoIf your behaviour would somehow be considered unacceptable when the camera isn’t rolling, then yes, I could see that constraining someone’s actions. I don’t see that as a negative though.
- g-b-r 3y agoUnacceptable behavior would be unacceptable camera or no camera, since you're in public (even in countries that limit recording you generally can record illegal behavior, if it's to report it to law enforcement). But the minimal standard for simply walking among strangers and for being recorded forever for the world to see is very different, if you care about your dignity. And that's all assuming there are surveillance cameras to limit other actions in the first place