4 ms·
I'm not religious either, but I don't think the logic holds up. Philosophers and scientists of the past came to all kinds of ridiculous conclusions, but it does
by ToValueFunfetti 3y ago
I'm not religious either, but I don't think the logic holds up. Philosophers and scientists of the past came to all kinds of ridiculous conclusions, but it doesn't follow that utilitarianism or atomic theory are ridiculous.
- cubefox 3y agoI think these theories were always more sophisticated than religions. And the work of ancient philosophers is still not completely outdated, e.g. Aristotle's logic holds up, albeit in a limited domain. Moreover, the former theories have since further increased in sophistication, while religion didn't get significantly more sophisticated. Though I admit your point is a good one and not so easily refuted. In general it is known as the "pessimistic meta-induction": Theories from the past were wrong, so we should think our current theories are wrong as well. See https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-theory-change/#DisaMetaIndu https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-theory-change/#Di... https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/#PessIndu https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/#PessI...