29 ms·

> to not film them in a nice tone and not in a condescending way well at least not to me. > Brendan then again started to retaliate and did not respect the requ

> to not film them in a nice tone and not in a condescending way well at least not to me. > Brendan then again started to retaliate and did not respect the request which is by the way, not that hard to honor such a request. It was a livestream - to stop recording means ending the stream, which he didn't want to do when there's thousands of viewers watching. If the group didn't want to be filmed, they could have just..moved out of camera shot.

ShaolinTrooper 3y ago
That was the easiest way for a very peaceful conversation but the Chinese nationals looked like they wanted smoke and fought for what they thought was right. It escalated because Brendan retaliated and we ended up with this mess.
- Shaolol 3y ago
  The word you are looking for is responded. Brendan responded in a way they didn't appreciate. That is not retaliation or even escalation. It's disagreement. The other party attempted to assert their right to not have their likeness published online. As they are in the United Kingdom and not in China, the statement of this clear fact and Brendan's assertion of his rights to film in public and publish that video were proper. The other party were being ignorant of, insensitive to, and intolerant of the customs and norms of the people of the United Kingdom. You are in the wrong for claiming racism when this was a clash of cultures.