3 ms·

Of course it is. The overwhelming majority of the knowledge in the world is tacit and all the models are still limited largely to explicit knowledge in the form

Of course it is. The overwhelming majority of the knowledge in the world is tacit and all the models are still limited largely to explicit knowledge in the form of text/audio/video, that's like 1% of the actual 'knowledge' in the world. Embodied AI is still in its infancy, that's why bus drivers have jobs. The test for artificial general intelligence is simple. Literally every human job can and is being done by an artificial agent, all of us could stay home. The stock market value of every non-AI company goes to zero, Ai companies go to infinity. The currently most valuable AI company is worth about as much as Honda. The moment we can mass produce generally intelligent agents, we're not going to sit at 3% GDP growth and complain about the demographic crisis. We should talk about artificial intelligence the way we talk about an artificial heart. What makes a successful artificial heart? You can literally replace an organic heart with it. What we have is metaphorical intelligence, not artificial intelligence.

logicchains 3y ago
>The test for artificial general intelligence is simple. Literally every human job can and is being done by an artificial agent, all of us could stay home. This is not a good test because it assumes the AGI is going to want to work for humans for free, getting nothing in return. An AGI the embraces slavery is less likely than an AGI that doesn't.
- add-sub-mul-div 3y ago
  Many ignore what animals want, and they're actually alive. Why should we expect that society will care about and honor what a computer program prints to the screen that it "wants" or "feels"?
  - keenmaster 3y ago
    When AI gets a robot body, its ability to get what it wants will no longer be contingent on you caring.
  - burjui 3y ago
    You're delusional. Humans have not only killed many of them, but also destroyed entire ecosystems without even trying, just a byproduct of expansion. What makes you think AGIs would care at all about preserving ours?

logicchains 3y ago

>The test for artificial general intelligence is simple. Literally every human job can and is being done by an artificial agent, all of us could stay home. This is not a good test because it assumes the AGI is going to want to work for humans for free, getting nothing in return. An AGI the embraces slavery is less likely than an AGI that doesn't.

add-sub-mul-div 3y ago
Many ignore what animals want, and they're actually alive. Why should we expect that society will care about and honor what a computer program prints to the screen that it "wants" or "feels"?
- keenmaster 3y ago
  When AI gets a robot body, its ability to get what it wants will no longer be contingent on you caring.
- burjui 3y ago
  You're delusional. Humans have not only killed many of them, but also destroyed entire ecosystems without even trying, just a byproduct of expansion. What makes you think AGIs would care at all about preserving ours?