3 ms·
I read a lot of history and some linguistics, it seems really fine to me. Linguistic especially, they work on _a lot_ of data, you don't have the "tested on 15
by orwin 3y ago
I read a lot of history and some linguistics, it seems really fine to me. Linguistic especially, they work on _a lot_ of data, you don't have the "tested on 15 subjects" from biology or medecine effect.
Even if i agreed with your "subjectively reasonable" idea, the issue is that non-STEM science encapsulate a lot of different fields.
- Palomides 3y agowhat's non-STEM science? the incentives of publishing and funding systems are similar across most fields (publish papers in the cool journals, get as many citations as possible, leverage that for more funding), I would be astonished if there were fields substantially exempt from bad science. I feel like my position is fair for any field publishing papers with falsifiable claims based on evidence?