3 ms·
if other AI trains on the "news" this generates won't it converge on articles that are nothing but "buffalo buffalo" for millions of pages?
by sidewndr46 3y ago
if other AI trains on the "news" this generates won't it converge on articles that are nothing but "buffalo buffalo" for millions of pages?
- refulgentis 3y agoI'm not sure why training on a diverse set of words would lead to converging on one word (but maybe there's a joke going over my head :P)
- jsnell 3y agoThe joke is referring to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffal...
- villson 3y ago"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." Is the longest grammatically correct sentence in English. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffal...
- nyc_data_geek1 3y agoIt's the longest grammatically correct sentence composed entirely of one repeating word.
- jerbear4328 3y agoThat sentence isn't the longest valid English sentence, for example, this sentence is longer. In fact, as that Wikipedia article says, you can extend that sentence as well: > Thomas Tymoczko has pointed out that there is nothing special about eight "buffalos"; any sentence consisting solely of the word "buffalo" repeated any number of times is grammatically correct. Anyone who wants to go down that rabbit hole, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_linguistic_example_sentences https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_linguistic_example_sen...
- airstrike 3y agoI love that the article has a diagram with Buffalo from Rochester, NY too LOL