> [but this ruling is only bad for the public] NO. It is GOOD for the public, because the public needs protection from criminals and law-breakers. This is not

> [but this ruling is only bad for the public] NO. It is GOOD for the public, because the public needs protection from criminals and law-breakers. This is not a public health 'hurdle' or emergency. And, if Apple believes in The Cause that is being proposed in this comment, it can simply PAY MASIMO and be Done-zo with this public health.