> So the courts agree that Apple uses AN anticompetitive PRACTICE. Fixed it. They said not allowing developers to say it was possible to pay externally was aga

> So the courts agree that Apple uses AN anticompetitive PRACTICE. Fixed it. They said not allowing developers to say it was possible to pay externally was against the law. I think a California law? They did not say that about Apple’s fee, the existence of only Apple’s App Store, or anything else. It was limited to anti-steering.