3 ms·
> Imagine if Apple or Google were retroactively removing a feature. The shitstorm would be outrageous. Is this sarcasm? Just in case it is not: https://killed
by wcoenen 3y ago
> Imagine if Apple or Google were retroactively removing a feature. The shitstorm would be outrageous.
Is this sarcasm? Just in case it is not:
https://killedby.tech/google/ https://killedby.tech/google/
- pbhjpbhj 3y agoAre any of those examples of removing a feature from a hardware device, which to me seemed to be the point of the parent. They're comparing car entertainment/GPS systems with phones. Maybe 12 years ago, I had a device with sideloading that allowed me to run Plex (genuinely used for photo viewing). NowTV removed side-loading via a forced update and thus removed the principle reason I bought that device rather than another. Bought a FireTV stick after that and downloaded Plex from their appstore.
- wcoenen 3y ago@Longhanks wasn't specifically talking about hardware. They said "Maybe don't try to shut down public services that millions of people actually rely on" and implied Google wouldn't do such a thing. Google did exactly this when it shut down Google Reader in 2013. Feedly saw an influx of 3 million new users in the two weeks following the shutdown. https://web.archive.org/web/20170721090528/https://blog.feedly.com/announcing-the-new-feedly-mobile-and-welcoming-3-million-reader-refugees/ https://web.archive.org/web/20170721090528/https://blog.feed...
- dukeyukey 3y agoThey've definitely bricked hardware before (e.g. Stadia, likely Jamboard).