3 ms·
The point is likely to show that Rust's "safety" is not absolute and it's possible to do lots of silly stuff with "safe" code.
by throwaway0665 3y ago
The point is likely to show that Rust's "safety" is not absolute and it's possible to do lots of silly stuff with "safe" code.
- lifthrasiir 3y agoThat's true but this particular crate exists to show an unevitable hole in the definition of memory safety, while you can do lots of stupid things (like, `rm -rf /`) only with absolutely safe code.
- api 3y agoAbsolute safety would require a totally managed runtime with least privilege, not a 1970s Unix derivative.