4 ms·
I would expect something like this to output only factually correct documentation since it would be used as reference; but it sounds like even under the upcomi
by GrinningFool 3y ago
I would expect something like this to output only factually correct documentation since it would be used as reference; but it sounds like even under the upcoming v2 that's not the case?
- HL33tibCe7 3y agoAutogenerating documentation that could then be corrected by a human could still have value, in fairness
- krupan 3y agoReally? How much value would you put on that actually? How would you price that if you were selling it? Would I get a little refund for each mistake I find and have to correct?
- GrinningFool 3y agoFor one-and-done, I agree. But if you're looking at dynamic code base and you want to keep your documentation in sync, having to make 'manually correct the generated output' part of your build process can get expensive. (And tedious for the poor grunt who's got to do the work.)
- oshams 3y agoWe think chain-of-verification and fine tuning will help a lot see the other response. We are really excited to launch v2 ASAP so we can address these concerns.