8 ms·

I have never had problems finding work, until now. It used to be easy. Recruiters used to call me at night. Now they ghost me.

1-6 3y ago
It could be that required skillsets have shifted in the past year.
gedy 3y ago
Yeah in past 20 years I would receive a job offer from nearly every company I interviewed with. Past few months have been really disappointing with rejections after interviews that I'd normally have said went great.
- mk89 3y ago
  It's also true that you have now 20+ years of experience. The higher you go, the harder it gets - you might want a different role, etc etc. If on the other hand you're competing with senior sw devs with 5+ years of experience, there could also be other factors to keep in mind (age, ability in very specific tech stacks, etc). I think companies are still hiring, but more focused, unlike in 2021-2022 when they over-hired "just in case".
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  - ChrisMarshallNY 3y ago
    > 20+ years of experience Welcome to my world. In-company recruiters are often quite helpful and accommodating, but, as soon as one single tech person gets involved, the temperature drops 30 degrees. Standalone recruiters send me these breathless emails, extolling my qualifications, but, as soon as they find out my age, they ghost me. I have actually had recruiters hang up on me, as soon as I told them my age. I learned to just mention that up front, to get the ghosting out of the way. Apparently, they aren't very good at math. I list 30 years+ experience, yet they seem to think that I'm under 35. After a while, I just gave up, and accepted that I'm retired. It's not the money; it's the "culture." Many folks, much younger, and much more inexperienced, are paid more than I ever made, in my entire career. I would have gladly accepted less money than I had made before. I don't really need it. The work is what interests me.
    - linuxftw 3y ago
      Maybe try changing over to management? You might have a shot at a non-tech centric company. Also, don't be above lying about your age.
      - ChrisMarshallNY 3y ago
        I was a manager. That's actually a problem. I don't lie; especially in my profession. It's a thing. I know that personal Integrity is considered a "quaint anachronism," in today's world, but I won't compromise on that.
        acdha 3y ago
        You’re right not to compromise and even if you were less ethical, that’s something which is easily detected and could lead to being fired with no recourse. It’s very reasonable for a company to say someone who lies about simple facts can’t be trusted with anything else.
        hattmall 3y ago
        You certainly don't have to lie, but there's no reason you can't simply calculate your age differently. The common 365 days to a year for age isn't a universal given.
        Natsu 3y ago
        You'll be a little less than half as old if you pretend to be a Martian with their 687 Earth days per Martian year. Just don't go with Neptune, it takes almost 165 years before you turn 1 there.
        Tommah 3y ago
        My grandfather used to say that he was "35 and a few months."
    - itsoktocry 3y ago
      >I would have gladly accepted less money than I had made before. I don't really need it. The work is what interests me. We need an acceptable way to express this, without desperately extolling you'll take less money. I think a lot of us "old guys" are in the same boat; I don't need 150k, I'll take 100k if the work is interesting, and I'm more likely to be loyal to boot.
  - gedy 3y ago
    I'm actually aiming lower in role and salary due to more senior roles being very sparse in my network. I'm not disagreeing with you per se, but the tech economy seems much worse recently and I don't think I'm suddenly worse, stale, or less productive.
- AnimalMuppet 3y ago
  The higher you go, the more expensive you get. And the fewer places see the value you bring compared to a cheaper "senior sw dev" with 5 years of experience. If you want to be paid more than someone with 5 years, you have to generate more value than they do, and you have to persuade the hiring manager that you can generate more value. The fraction of places that can see that is smaller than the fraction that can see the value of a senior over a junior. (On the other hand, for those places, the competition for the jobs is also less severe - there aren't tons of people with 20 years of experience on the street at any given time.) So it takes longer than it did when you had 5 years of experience. But keep looking. There are places that will see the value in what you provide. The job category you're looking for is "principal software engineer" or "staff software engineer".
  - yesdocs 3y ago
    The mere statement that a 5 year ‘Senior’ software engineer has more perceived value than a ‘Senior’ software engineer with 20 years of experience is just crazy. Let’s replace ‘software engineer’ with ‘electrician’ and then tell me this is sane.
    - AnimalMuppet 3y ago
      That wasn't my statement. Let me try again. A 5 year software engineer may have more perceived value per cost than a 20 year software engineer. Sure, if they have the same salary, you hire the 20 year engineer, but they don't. The 20 year engineer expects more pay, and (rightly) won't work for 5-years-of-experience wages. So you have to find an employer that perceives the additional value of the additional 15 years of experience.
      - yesdocs 3y ago
        Have you seen the salary requirements for these jobs? People are being paid way more than they were being paid 10 years ago. Nobody, and I mean nobody, is turning down jobs because of insufficient wages. The perceived ‘value’ that an employer sees is the ability of being able to exploit a younger engineer with ridiculous timelines and all night ‘coding sessions’ because they don’t have a family waiting for them when they get home.

1-6 3y ago

It could be that required skillsets have shifted in the past year.

gedy 3y ago

Yeah in past 20 years I would receive a job offer from nearly every company I interviewed with. Past few months have been really disappointing with rejections after interviews that I'd normally have said went great.

mk89 3y ago
It's also true that you have now 20+ years of experience. The higher you go, the harder it gets - you might want a different role, etc etc. If on the other hand you're competing with senior sw devs with 5+ years of experience, there could also be other factors to keep in mind (age, ability in very specific tech stacks, etc). I think companies are still hiring, but more focused, unlike in 2021-2022 when they over-hired "just in case".
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- ChrisMarshallNY 3y ago
  > 20+ years of experience Welcome to my world. In-company recruiters are often quite helpful and accommodating, but, as soon as one single tech person gets involved, the temperature drops 30 degrees. Standalone recruiters send me these breathless emails, extolling my qualifications, but, as soon as they find out my age, they ghost me. I have actually had recruiters hang up on me, as soon as I told them my age. I learned to just mention that up front, to get the ghosting out of the way. Apparently, they aren't very good at math. I list 30 years+ experience, yet they seem to think that I'm under 35. After a while, I just gave up, and accepted that I'm retired. It's not the money; it's the "culture." Many folks, much younger, and much more inexperienced, are paid more than I ever made, in my entire career. I would have gladly accepted less money than I had made before. I don't really need it. The work is what interests me.
  - linuxftw 3y ago
    Maybe try changing over to management? You might have a shot at a non-tech centric company. Also, don't be above lying about your age.
    - ChrisMarshallNY 3y ago
      I was a manager. That's actually a problem. I don't lie; especially in my profession. It's a thing. I know that personal Integrity is considered a "quaint anachronism," in today's world, but I won't compromise on that.
      - acdha 3y ago
        You’re right not to compromise and even if you were less ethical, that’s something which is easily detected and could lead to being fired with no recourse. It’s very reasonable for a company to say someone who lies about simple facts can’t be trusted with anything else.
      - hattmall 3y ago
        You certainly don't have to lie, but there's no reason you can't simply calculate your age differently. The common 365 days to a year for age isn't a universal given.
        Natsu 3y ago
        You'll be a little less than half as old if you pretend to be a Martian with their 687 Earth days per Martian year. Just don't go with Neptune, it takes almost 165 years before you turn 1 there.
        Tommah 3y ago
        My grandfather used to say that he was "35 and a few months."
  - itsoktocry 3y ago
    >I would have gladly accepted less money than I had made before. I don't really need it. The work is what interests me. We need an acceptable way to express this, without desperately extolling you'll take less money. I think a lot of us "old guys" are in the same boat; I don't need 150k, I'll take 100k if the work is interesting, and I'm more likely to be loyal to boot.
- gedy 3y ago
  I'm actually aiming lower in role and salary due to more senior roles being very sparse in my network. I'm not disagreeing with you per se, but the tech economy seems much worse recently and I don't think I'm suddenly worse, stale, or less productive.
AnimalMuppet 3y ago
The higher you go, the more expensive you get. And the fewer places see the value you bring compared to a cheaper "senior sw dev" with 5 years of experience. If you want to be paid more than someone with 5 years, you have to generate more value than they do, and you have to persuade the hiring manager that you can generate more value. The fraction of places that can see that is smaller than the fraction that can see the value of a senior over a junior. (On the other hand, for those places, the competition for the jobs is also less severe - there aren't tons of people with 20 years of experience on the street at any given time.) So it takes longer than it did when you had 5 years of experience. But keep looking. There are places that will see the value in what you provide. The job category you're looking for is "principal software engineer" or "staff software engineer".
- yesdocs 3y ago
  The mere statement that a 5 year ‘Senior’ software engineer has more perceived value than a ‘Senior’ software engineer with 20 years of experience is just crazy. Let’s replace ‘software engineer’ with ‘electrician’ and then tell me this is sane.
  - AnimalMuppet 3y ago
    That wasn't my statement. Let me try again. A 5 year software engineer may have more perceived value per cost than a 20 year software engineer. Sure, if they have the same salary, you hire the 20 year engineer, but they don't. The 20 year engineer expects more pay, and (rightly) won't work for 5-years-of-experience wages. So you have to find an employer that perceives the additional value of the additional 15 years of experience.
    - yesdocs 3y ago
      Have you seen the salary requirements for these jobs? People are being paid way more than they were being paid 10 years ago. Nobody, and I mean nobody, is turning down jobs because of insufficient wages. The perceived ‘value’ that an employer sees is the ability of being able to exploit a younger engineer with ridiculous timelines and all night ‘coding sessions’ because they don’t have a family waiting for them when they get home.