Took me a while to parse this. Not sure what the relationship is here: 1/ you clearly do think the source tells you something about the credibility (in your ca

Took me a while to parse this. Not sure what the relationship is here: 1/ you clearly do think the source tells you something about the credibility (in your case you now think NYT is not highly credible), 2/ the laptop story was given to the Post, it's not like they gumshoed it, 3/ the hospital bombing was about a current event which typically carries a lower bar than something that can be verified over days like the laptop story or the DB Cooper heist. This isn't a defense of the NYT, they definitely lost credibility with that debacle which could have easily been fixed with tighter headlines and more circumspection in the initial reporting.