4 ms·
It seems to me that, it's the other way around. Life isn't neutral. To expect some kind of neutral zone is to make the world dead of life. There has to be recon
by trinsic2 3y ago
It seems to me that, it's the other way around.
Life isn't neutral. To expect some kind of neutral zone is to make the world dead of life. There has to be reconciliation between people, or society will tear itself apart.
- akoboldfrying 3y agoIs it ever appropriate to be polite? That is, is it ever better to pretend we are more OK with something than we really are (for example, by saying nothing), than to speak our dissatisfaction plainly? If you say yes, then you already accept "neutral zones" on some level -- that's what politeness is. If you say no, I'm interested to know how you avoid hurting the people in your life.
- trinsic2 3y agoSorry I didn't see this until now. You can still be polite, and speak your truth about something. If someone takes office to someone else's understanding of situation, that is really about wanting to create bubbles of perception for the person that doesn't want to hear an alternate oppinion. We cannot live in a healthy world if there isn't real discourse about the problems in life.
- knorker 3y ago> To expect some kind of neutral zone is to make the world dead of life. You call this hate filled divisive mutual nazi-calling "life"? Neutral zones disappearing is exactly what's causing society to tear itself apart.