> People won't know the implications of decisions without regulations to help them. That's a pretty expansive view of government; I'll grant that regulations a

> People won't know the implications of decisions without regulations to help them. That's a pretty expansive view of government; I'll grant that regulations are one mechanism for communicating the implications of decisions, but to say that people can't know the implications without regulations? That just seems silly to the point that I'm unsure if I'm intended to legitimately engage with that viewpoint; is that your actual opinion?