3 ms·

> your company it's not your company, until you own a controlling share. > This idea is no more authoritarian than whistleblower protection laws. the big dif

• John23832 3y ago
  >it's not your company, until you own a controlling share. When you enter into an employment contract with a company, you have a legal connection. The use of "your" is appropriate. >the big difference is that whistleblowing is for protection against retaliation _for_ reporting illegal activities. Last time i looked, being as asshole CEO is not illegal. They are one in the same. Speaking about conduct and activities which can affect working conditions within a company is the basis of whistleblowing protections under the law (in the US). Speaking about conduct of a CEO in relation to the rules of conduct within your company is the same legal concept.