4 ms·
I doubt that. This is a press release about a business. If press releases were illegally "giving information on how the business is operated to some investors"
by staticman2 3y ago
I doubt that. This is a press release about a business. If press releases were illegally "giving information on how the business is operated to some investors" then, for example, Apple could never hold press events and would have to announce things on their investor page.
- lesuorac 3y agoI don't think we're talking about the same thing. Parent said "but I'm not privy to some of the investor calls where they elaborate on how they define these terms. Typically things like "business unit operating model" will be illuminated / detailed in other presentations with a smaller audience". I'm saying that I think that Xerox can't be explaining things in this much depth to some investors but not others. Certainly Xerox can give information to CNBC to release to all investors (who read CNBC) at roughly the same time. It's basically public since everybody has CNBC access but a private presentation is by definition not public.