3 ms·
Blame & diffs are much more useful to me in the context of GitHub. I don't care about someone's subjective ~50 char description of a change. The important part
by bob1029 3y ago
Blame & diffs are much more useful to me in the context of GitHub. I don't care about someone's subjective ~50 char description of a change. The important part is the pull request itself and that it references whatever issue prompted the change.
Commit messages have only ever been useful in tracking my own intermediate work products. Often times, I will leave helpful bread crumbs in my commit notes if I know I won't be working on something for a few days. We strictly do squash+merge, so I don't have to worry about these things causing trouble for others. All of our commits into master have some standardized "Issue #1234" note as automatically copied from the PR title (which we do have ~standardized).
If we didnt have some git wrapper like GitHub available, then I suspect we'd be significantly more aggressive with policy around our commit messages.
- g-b-r 3y agoIf your process requires trashing the commit messages it's not surprising you don't find them useful.