3 ms·
There’s a general principle here. For any arbitrary human action (or inaction, which is also action) there exists someone who will object on grounds that they b
by api 3y ago
There’s a general principle here. For any arbitrary human action (or inaction, which is also action) there exists someone who will object on grounds that they believe are reasonable.
If you give each of these objections credence, the result is total paralysis and totalitarian repression of everyone. Vetocracy isn’t democracy. It’s the dictatorship of every minority.
There are people (e.g. Christian fundamentalists) who are personally offended by the mere existence of the Navajo religion too, or its ceremonies. Should we listen to them?
The test is whether anyone is being harmed. Nobody lives on the moon.