6 ms·
The highest-resolution photos of snowflakes (2021)
- ggm 3y agoI increasingly find the no two alike thing exasperating. Almost nothing in nature above the subatomic/atomic/molecule level is "alike" in crystals or anything else. Making BIPM spheres of counted atoms does not truly make them identical. Cubic crystals of salt will have differences. At the level of detail most people can discern, I suspect many morphological forms of ice crystal are very alike, and we have to resort to the small imperfections to get to not alike. Nothing is exactly the same. That's what discrete countable things are: distinct. (Of course it's semantics. And poetic license. Most snowflakes are trivially unlike, and those which are nearly alike have discernible difference if you go looking for them. As do cells, flowers, grains of sand.. )
- topherclay 3y agoThat's a fun thought experiment: to imagine what level of detail of snowflakes most people are able to discern. Reminds me of a little bit of that one xkcd. https://xkcd.com/2501/ https://xkcd.com/2501/
- zafka 3y agoThanks! Your comment compelled me to look up olivine and then feldspar to check their formulas. Becoming much more aware of the makeup of minerals is on my list of things to do.
- behnamoh 3y agoDo we have evidence or proof about "no two alike" or is it more like an educated guess?
- beenBoutIT 3y agoSnowflakes processed via this method could be the future of true random.
- j4yav 3y agoThere's a whole class of factoids where it seems some people are unable to resist bringing it up even when the connection to the current discussion is quite tenuous, and a reactionary set of people who are unable to resist a stock reply to the mention (which varies depending on the topic, but generally it's an "actually" calling out some exception to the first statement). In reality, everyone has read both the factoid and the stock reply a million times. It would be interesting to document and track these. They are almost like little autonomous programs that run on people's consciousness, which I guess is a just a meme per the original definition.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- ChrisArchitect 3y ago(2021) Related from then: Photos of Snowflakes Like You've Never Seen Them Before https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/10/science/snowflakes-photos-nathan-myhrvold.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/10/science/snowflakes-photos...
- dang 3y agoThanks! Macroexpanded: Highest resolution photos ever taken of snowflakes - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25939169 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25939169 - Jan 2021 (26 comments) Ultra High Resolution Photos of Snowflakes - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25414579 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25414579 - Dec 2020 (88 comments)
- OJFord 3y ago> device, which stands at about five feet in height off the ground when placed on a table And is about the length of three football fields when dismantled and spaced equally across them?
- BobaFloutist 3y agoGood catch, that's a remarkably poor description. A table can easily be anywhere from like two to four feet tall, so this device is anywhere from one to three feet tall, neither of which sounds nearly as impressive as five feet.
- tempodox 3y agoRelated: How big can a a snowflake get? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38797629 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38797629 Earliest Snowflake Photos From 1885 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38816521 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38816521
- hooloovoo_zoo 3y agoHehe snowflakes should prove a patent challenge worthy of Myrvhold.
- julieturner99 3y agoHN title should note this article is from 2021.
- valiant-comma 3y agoAre these really higher resolution than the 2010 scans from an electron microscope[1]? [1] https://www.wired.com/2010/12/snowflakes-by-microscope/ https://www.wired.com/2010/12/snowflakes-by-microscope/
- technojamin 3y agoProbably not, but those aren't photographs.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- technojamin 3y agoHere's a fantastic Veritasium video about snowflakes with a scientist that basically figured out all of the ways they can form: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ao2Jfm35XeE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ao2Jfm35XeE
- hermitcrab 3y agoI don't understand how snowflakes are different to each other and yet also symmetric. Are they always symmetric?
- tim333 3y agoThe symmetry is imperfect.
- hermitcrab 3y agoI don't understand how they are even close to symmetric. The 'seed' seems unlikely to be symmetric. There is no way for one 'arm' to communicate directly with another. And the conditions (temperature etc) is unlikely to be completely uniform around that seed.
- neurostimulant 3y ago> The ice crystals that make up snowflakes are symmetrical (or patterned) because they reflect the internal order of the crystal’s water molecules as they arrange themselves in predetermined spaces (known as “crystallization”) to form a six-sided snowflake. https://www.noaa.gov/stories/how-do-snowflakes-form-science-behind-snow https://www.noaa.gov/stories/how-do-snowflakes-form-science-...
- hermitcrab 3y ago>Because each arm experiences the same atmospheric conditions, the arms look identical. Thanks. But I'm still not convinced. If it is just that the microclimate around the seed is the same, why aren't adjacent crystals identical?
- clintfred 3y agoMaybe they are? Has this been tested?
- firecall 3y ago
- ekanes 3y agoFun fact - the inventor is none other than Nathan Myhrvold, the OG patent troll.