6 ms·
That's fine, keep your content. Once you distribute it and ask the state to control people's ongoing sharing of that content though, then we ('we the people') a
by pbhjpbhj 3y ago
That's fine, keep your content. Once you distribute it and ask the state to control people's ongoing sharing of that content though, then we ('we the people') are not going to be so keen as you to lock up your content as we gain little from such laws.
I support your right not to share your creations.
- nirvdrum 3y agoI gain a lot from such laws. It helps stimulate the arts. Without the ability to earn money from creations, that will leave the arts to a patron model or as the purview of the already wealthy. Given the collective disdain for anyone pursuing a liberal arts education, I don’t see the patron model resurrecting en masse. I don’t feel entitled to the work output of anyone for anything. I’d much rather give creators a chance to become self-sufficient than live with the alternative. There I see only bland corporate cash grabs and a further shift to subscription-based access to any content. To be sure, we already have some of that. But, we also have artistic output from others that wouldn’t be able to subsist without the promise of protection afforded by copyright.
- hef19898 3y agoI don't share much, true. And I din't ask the state to intervene. I expect the state to provide the legal framework for me to intervene if I choose so. And guess what, the states and nations did: copyright law, patents, trademarks...