3 ms·
>content whose substance was created by someone else And how did the training data contribute to the content in any meaningful way? Inspiration isn't substance
by fennecbutt 3y ago
>content whose substance was created by someone else
And how did the training data contribute to the content in any meaningful way? Inspiration isn't substance.
You think all fantasy writers gotta pay Tolkien estate bc so much of fantasy draws from his tropes? Lmao no.
- caconym_ 3y ago> And how did the training data contribute to the content in any meaningful way? Inspiration isn't substance. If training data is so unimportant, why not simply not use it and avoid the controversy? At the very least that would certainly fix the issue where the model demonstrates how "inspired" it is by NYT articles by reproducing them verbatim. :)