It seems reasonable to assume that's it's instead something like 10 simultaneous 2:1 battles, and you need to win a majority of them. That's very different odd

It seems reasonable to assume that's it's instead something like 10 simultaneous 2:1 battles, and you need to win a majority of them. That's very different odds than a single 2:1 battle. He seems stuck on interpreting feedback through the lens of a linear-odds, one-shot model. The player feedback is that it shouldn't be linear, and there should be less randomness for larger numbers. That all makes sense to me... and I suspect makes sense to him when he's not giving a talk for comedic effect.