3 ms·
If it’s lossy compressed how come they have verbatim content from NYT in there that’s easy to recall? That’s what the lawsuit is about.
by jamiek88 3y ago
If it’s lossy compressed how come they have verbatim content from NYT in there that’s easy to recall? That’s what the lawsuit is about.
- anon291 3y agoMany humans have photographic memories. Not common, but not unheard of for people to be able to memorize long portions of text verbatim. For example, the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_claimed_to_possess_an_eidetic_memory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_claimed_to_poss... contains several examples of people who were able to look at pages and recite them back. That is actually a much stronger ability than GPT since GPT has presumably looked at them 100 times.
- amelius 3y agoYes, and a car is fast horse. Your argument does not tell us anything about whether or not GPT should be legal. Laws are created by people (not by computers reasoning that all analogies must be true). And fairness is an important part of that process.