3 ms·
Yup, Logseq is simply too different. It basically wants to go farther than what Obsidian aims to achieve. That said, some features of Logseq are janky, as they
by esjeon 3y ago
Yup, Logseq is simply too different. It basically wants to go farther than what Obsidian aims to achieve. That said, some features of Logseq are janky, as they are not refined enough. I think Obsidian hit the sweat spot that is easy to implement yet offers enough features.
- solarkraft 3y ago+1 for jank. Exactly like what was the case for Athens, the core features don't feel very refined (glitches in block editing and not good at all search) and the focus is on building arguably unnecessary features. On a cursory look it seems like Obsidian puts more effort into having a solid core, which I appreciate. But Logseq is actually FOSS and fits my needs better with its paradigms.