4 ms·
The veins are made in the process, thought the gold itself was already present in the water which was vaporized due to the pressure of earthquake
by ovih 3y ago
The veins are made in the process, thought the gold itself was already present in the water which was vaporized due to the pressure of earthquake
- quickthrower2 3y agoYep you need a neutron star or black hole collision I think to make the initial gold from more basic “elements” :-)
- NoMoreNicksLeft 3y agoSeems like a lot of work. What if I just make boron instead? Everyone likes boron.
- BLKNSLVR 3y agohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghD5SHuR9mk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghD5SHuR9mk
- denton-scratch 3y agoI thought a boron was the particle corresponding to the tedium field.
- LegitShady 3y agoits the name. boron sounds like a combination of boring and moron. who wants boron?
- sleeplessworld 3y agoNobody doesn't like molten boron! ;-)
- PhasmaFelis 3y agoAnd yet they made a whole movie about it, with Bruce Willis, Milla Jovovich, and Gary Oldman.
- LegitShady 3y agoyou forgot to mention the most successful star of that show, chris tucker.
- codemiscreant 3y agoOr a particle accelerator, some bismuth, and low expectations of quantities.
- Natsu 3y agoI thought I remembered a method using radioactive mercury instead, but yeah, not really fun times.
- dekhn 3y agoHe literally made the Philosopher's Stone, although uneconomical https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_T._Seaborg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_T._Seaborg """In 1980, he transmuted several thousand atoms of bismuth-209 into gold (197 Au) at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. His experimental technique, using the lab's Bevalac particle accelerator, was able to remove protons and neutrons from the bismuth atoms by bombarding it with carbon and neon nuclei traveling near the speed of light.[47] Seaborg's technique would have been far too expensive to enable routine manufacturing of gold, but his work was close to the mythical Philosopher's Stone.[48][49] As gold has four fewer protons and (taking the only naturally occurring bulk isotopes of either) eight fewer neutrons than bismuth, a total of twelve nucleons have to be removed from the bismuth nucleus to produce gold using Seaborg's method.""" the building where plutonium was first synthesized still exists ont he berkeley campus although IIRC they had to clean it up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilman_Hall#Room_307 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilman_Hall#Room_307
- tharkun__ 3y agoJust asking for a friend: How much bismuth might there be in a bale of straw and does it depend on the source of the straw?
- toasted-subs 3y agoHold my beer, I think I have one of those in my backyard.
- dredmorbius 3y agoTrue, though understanding the mechanisms of ore formation is a substantial advance. There's a critical distinction between the abundance of chemical elements within Earth's crust and how, where, and when they are concentrated. I'm not generally familiar with the topic, but of a few instances: - Most iron ore is of biological origin, with so-called "banded iron formations" (BIFs) being largely formed in two episodes, ~3 billion and 1 billion years ago, largely by early bacteria. - "Rare earths" aren't so much rare as unconcentrated. By overall abundance, these are fairly common, but because they do not form ores, they're found at low concentrations, and are often recovered as by-products of other mining activities. Keep in mind that the issue of ore formation and its reliance on processes specific to Earth's geological evolution, including plate tectonics and biological activity, mean that prospects for mining on other worlds (the Moon, Mars, asteroids) are likely to face radically different circumstances. Then again, mining in such areas would also likely be focused strongly on substances considered generally abundant on Earth, such as oxygen and water.