4 ms·
Let's go back to the source, Cory Doctorow's article: Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make thing
by tomjakubowski 3y ago
Let's go back to the source, Cory Doctorow's article:
Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die. I call this enshittification...
It would seem not to apply here. Bowling alleys don't really have a two-sided marketplace; they don't have business customers to sell the fruits of abusing their bowling customers, if you could call subjecting bowlers to a more annoying set of pins "abuse".
- layer8 3y agoI don't see the business-customer aspect as essential for enshittification to happen. In the end, it's about the platforms wanting to maximize value for themselves, once they've captured the user base. A third party of business customers being involved, and maybe also abused, is rather incidental, and makes no difference for the users who end up with the bad experience.
- nemothekid 3y ago>I don't see the business-customer aspect as essential for enshittification to happen If you don't make this distinction, then "enshittification" is no different from "P/E-style value extraction" which has been around long before tech industry. The destruction of Sears was done purely on a profit motive but did not happen in the same manner of tech platforms today. Furthermore, I don't see how a bowling alley is now a "platform". These are individual businesses taking cost cutting measures to keep the lights on because the sport is dying.
- Dylan16807 3y agoThe bowlers are not captured here. Even if we use the reduced definition, not every corner cut in the world would count as enshittification. And users having a bad experience is even more broad. Enshittification is a specific method/cause. I would not say it's incidental.