4 ms·

Open up what? If they write a rule that doesn’t specify technical details, it seems like the already existing functionality to send and receive SMS messages fro

Open up what? If they write a rule that doesn’t specify technical details, it seems like the already existing functionality to send and receive SMS messages from the iMessage app would be sufficient.

pseudalopex 3y ago
> Open up what? The iMessage service. > If they write a rule that doesn’t specify technical details, it seems like the already existing functionality to send and receive SMS messages from the iMessage app would be sufficient. The app is Messages.
- Grustaf 3y ago
  That rule would probably then apply to all message apps
  - SpaghettiCthulu 3y ago
    Which would be a good thing!
    - Grustaf 3y ago
      From a philosophical or practical standpoint? For me personally, I don’t care at all, i have no philosophical objections to companies running their own, closed chat apps. There are no hurdles for new entrants. And practically speaking, it’s a very small inconvenience to have to switch app when chatting to some friends. It even has some benefits, each of the apps will have fewer conversations to keep track of.