5 ms·
I’m on the edge of concluding that the iPhone was actually a bad thing and that the mobile revolution is on balance bad for humanity. * There is something addi
by api 3y ago
I’m on the edge of concluding that the iPhone was actually a bad thing and that the mobile revolution is on balance bad for humanity.
* There is something addictive about this form factor plus the touch interface, especially when combined with the way apps have designed to maximize the effect. This is by far the worst thing about this platform.
* They are “too” easy to use. Before the iPhone and iOS (and a bit later Android) people were becoming “computer literate.” Remember that phrase? They were learning to actually use information technology. Mobile halted that process.
* It’s a medium for consumption, not production. Input with them is slow and cumbersome and best suited for short sound bites like tweets or TikTok videos.
* They bias media toward short interaction and therefore shallow content. You can't express complex ideas that way.
* They constantly interrupt and combined with short form interaction and addiction are destructive to attention.
* They were built from the ground up to be walled gardens that crush experimentation and innovation.
* They are surveillance machines, and lend themselves to significantly more intrusive surveillance than most other tech except maybe cars… and cars are just trying to ape the mobile surveillance model.
* The ecosystem is toxic and built around exploiting the user through addiction, surveillance, and impulsive purchasing.
* Since they are so constrained, they supercharged the trend of all compute moving to the cloud where you own nothing and have no privacy.
The phrase “cigarettes of the mind” seems to fit.
All the useful things my phone does could be done with a much simpler device providing a map, a way to text and read email, and a browser. Most everything else is superfluous and a large amount of it is actively harmful, especially to young people and those not tech savvy enough to avoid the predatory aspects of the system.
If you could order Uber or Lyft through a browser I would be tempted to get one of those hipster minimal phones. There’s no technical reason you couldn’t. They just want you to use the app to maximize tracking.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- RyanHamilton 3y agoThey are being made into consumers, for profit. Big companies don't want you producing mspaint artwork, writing little games yourself. They want you consuming generically bland content that they can place advertising beside to make you go buy stuff. There's a slightly similar story with food and why many kids eat sugar. Oh sure you have a choice but when everone has a phone, everyone has a TV, every store has a chocolate aisle at the counter and you've seen 1000 adverts by age 2. Is it really a choice.
- nunez 3y agoI think you expressed my frustration with today's smartphones significantly more clearly than I could. Thank you! I've been using smartphones since 2003. Smartphones prior to the iPhone were tools through and through. They were designed to be communicators, or maps, or, sometimes, actual phones. Texting with T9 with feature phones was definitely popular, but they were still very limited in capability. I don't think the iPhone was borne to become an addictive consumption machine. I think it was created to make smartphones more accessible. It succeeded at doing that. Great things exist today because of the iPhone. Unfortunately, there will always be people who are out to make money no matter the cost, and I don't think anyone knew or foresaw the consequences of long-term phone use that exist today.
- api 3y agoOh I agree that it wasn't planned this way. I think they were just trying to make a great touch screen interface and we accidentally discovered that this format lends itself very effectively to addictive content consumption. I don't think it was a conspiracy.