>Is it useful to challenge you to look at one of these patents and actually try to build the thing? I don't particularly think so. Patents are meant for a pers

>Is it useful to challenge you to look at one of these patents and actually try to build the thing? I don't particularly think so. Patents are meant for a person of "ordinary skill" in the art. I don't make these devices. I'm not a person equipped to offer an opinion on whether the patent discloses sufficient information. >Sorry, nothing was forcibly publicly disclosed here. These guys got patent protection, the public got nothing. The way the invention works is what is disclosed. Patents aren't blueprints. It's even more ridiculous that you are making this comment when Apple seems to have infringed.