3 ms·
> And even if that was feasible, what the hell do they gain? a few more years of employment, at best. It sucks, but it's reality. There's no stopping the onsla
by chii 3y ago
> And even if that was feasible, what the hell do they gain?
a few more years of employment, at best. It sucks, but it's reality. There's no stopping the onslaught of AI.
Better start learning how to take advantage of the AI tools to make yourself not irrelevant.
- camillomiller 3y agoThe lack of humanism in comments like this one are worrying. The fact that you don’t understand art or the artistic process doesn’t mean they are not relevant to a healthy society.
- taylodl 3y agoPlus it ignores the fact that all of our jobs are going to go away to automation and AI. Which can be a utopia other than we humans seem to be hell-bent on creating dystopias.
- sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y agoI for one am looking forward to our fully automated gay space communist overlords.
- chii 3y ago> they are not relevant to a healthy society. if they are relevant, then the proof would be that they'd be paid to create art by other humans who believe this notion of relevency.
- camillomiller 3y agoCapitalism is not the natural state of things
- chii 3y agoNo it isn't. The law of the jungle is the natural state of things. I dont know about you, but i'd prefer capitalism to the natural state of things.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> a few more years of employment Many less years than if they learned the new tools that magnify productivity.