3 ms·
Is not hard for me to see a case being built around the idea of finding value in having code to stay excluded from the surface exposed to AI so it becomes impos
by sebastianconcpt 3y ago
Is not hard for me to see a case being built around the idea of finding value in having code to stay excluded from the surface exposed to AI so it becomes impossible for it to predate it.
It's a type of "security" that doesn't find an answer in "better AIs" or "AIs with improved alignment". The value comes out of being safe from the risk that can come out of the humans in control of these AIs.
I comes out of staying away and making impossible for any and all AIs to touch it.
Like the difference between food from a chef and hyperindustrialized food.
What if you want chef food only?
In the same way, exclusively human software creations.
- Jgrubb 3y agoI like this analogy but I guess I see it more like man inventing the knife, so he doesn't have to rip the animal to shreds with his bare hands anymore.
- sebastianconcpt 3y agoExcept the knives do not have the capacity to give parts of the protein to other knives users surreptitiously and it's in AI's very nature to absolutely do that.
- steezeburger 3y agoDoes the chef not use tools?
- sebastianconcpt 3y agoRobot chefs are tools? Are they chefs?
- ahepp 3y agoShall we call it the "slow code movement"?
- sebastianconcpt 3y agoNice. You're starting to make me think in how a manifesto should sound like.