11 ms·
I think captchas disappear next year or so. Already was soft human determination.
by mdale 3y ago
I think captchas disappear next year or so. Already was soft human determination.
- topspin 3y agoWhat replaces captchas? Are there any not excessively burdensome tests that a standard issue human can pass that a machine somehow cannot? I'm assuming the "find all the bicycles" tests are also obsolete.
- ReactiveJelly 3y agoSadly, probably something like TPMs or email logins (from a reputable email provider of course, one who requires SMS to sign up, from a reputable phone provider of course, one who doesn't offer free VoIP numbers and requires a credit card to sign up, from a reputable card brand of course, not a burner card)
- radium3d 3y agofrom a reputable card brand who doesn't allow usage of stolen cards? lol maybe the internet just implodes.
- nomel 3y agoSomething realtime, like video, is beyond most models at the moment. After that, realtime input, like little mini game you have to show proficiency at by scoring 5. I think the mini game approach could be fun. It could probably work for a year or two. :-\
- serf 3y agothe minigame thing has been defeated for a long time. it's trivial to solve when there are only so many subsets of a game, however randomized the starting states are. I guess there is a silver-lining in the premise of AI generated one-time-use games for that sake, but then there is a significant "can a human even do this?" problem to conquer at that point.. and worse the same AI tech is going to be established on the opposite side of the wall trying to defeat the thing. I think it'll all boil down to some sort of state-license fallback method like "please enter a CC or ID number to continue" -- which is ultimately a defeat of the user, unfortunately.
- SirMaster 3y agoDoesn't the checkmark thing work? Or are bots somehow able to do those too?
- quickthrower2 3y agoAn international identity card :-/
- _cjse 3y agoA market of human-oriented hardware keys, where the keys are only intended to be sold to actual human beings, with legal or otherwise cash bounties in place for people who can provide evidence of the keys being sold to or otherwise falling into the hands of non-human entities.
- Roark66 3y agoWhat's stopping a human buying a thousand to use for his bot farm?
- hiAndrewQuinn 3y agoAs mentioned, a bounty system. Someone who buys a thousand to use would have to be very clever to evade the eyes of all the people interested in profiting off of revealing his actions and getting the chips turned off.
- tomjen3 3y agoNothing. People will have to realise that when you put things out for the world you put things out for the world.
- shadowgovt 3y agoWho pays for the bandwidth and download resources then?
- baydarr 3y agoThe website or service owners. If they can't afford it they should be out of business and do something else. The web is big enough for both humans and bots.
- shadowgovt 3y agoNo thank you. I prefer to live by the code "Every request is a two way conversation. The client may accept, and the server may choose to emit." Just because I emit to other clients does not obligate me to emit to yours, any more than my emission of ads obligates you to accept and render them (but if you don't, or if you choose to ignore my CAPTCHAs, I may choose not to emit to you).
- baydarr 3y agoThat's fighting a losing battle. Clients find their way around any restriction, which by itself risks your service or website losing ground and being overtaken by the alternatives.
- shadowgovt 3y agoYes, it's all measure countermeasure. But you'll note that the most successful sites out there have bot protection and actively invest in it. I'm not concerned about the being overtaken narrative; My concern is the other scenario, where after the bots are done consuming and exfiltrating my data, I have no bandwidth to serve humans and my data is being vended from other sources now anyway. It's also not really that much of a losing battle. Cloudflare will fight the battle for me quite well for free, and even better for a pittance.
- chii 3y ago> a standard issue human can pass that a machine somehow cannot? may be the premise is wrong. Why prevent non-humans from registering/using/viewing?
- shadowgovt 3y agoBecause automated systems operating at scale outstrip the ability of the administrator to maintain the service provided.
- chii 3y agoIf each additional user is not adding additional revenue that exceeds the cost of that user (automated or not), you don't have a business model.
- shadowgovt 3y agoBut if you can keep the bots off your bandwidth you don't necessarily need a business model, depending on what you intend to share online.
- croemer 3y agoOption 1: Micropayments, high enough to discourage bot operators but not the intended human audience will be better for website operators as soon as it becomes too easy for AI to solve captchas. If website operators don't explicitly introduce micropayments as a captcha alternative, there will be browser plugins that outsource captcha solving to AI for a micropayment, which has the same effect. Option 2: Using a means of authentication that can't be obtained cheaply at scale by bots, e.g. Twitter accounts, Gmail accounts, government ID, ...
- lakpan 3y agoThat’s excessively optimistic. The most likely scenario is that we’ll have captchas for the next 30 years but only humans will be bothered by them.
- zztop44 3y agoJust like the technology basically exists for fully autonomous self-owned fleets of self driving robotaxis. Where the only jobs for humans are cleaning vomit off the back seat.
- resolutebat 3y agoThis. There are plenty of government websites etc out there that have completely antiquated captchas next to the helpful "works best in Internet Explorer 6" suggestion.
- lakpan 3y agoThis is exactly what I was referring to. “Minimal compliance” and unmaintained websites.
- js8 3y agoSounds like DRM - pirates do not care, legitimate users are bothered.