4 ms·

I would really like to speed up my workflow with a faster ESLint alternative, but my ESLint configs are often very customized, with rules and plugins that are n

by art0rz 3y ago

I would really like to speed up my workflow with a faster ESLint alternative, but my ESLint configs are often very customized, with rules and plugins that are not available (yet) in the alternative solutions, making them a non-starter for me. It'll take a while for these alternatives to reach plugin/rule parity.

maccard 3y ago
Would you consider removing your customisations to be closer to the workflows supported by these tools? One of the great things about go is that you're free to have an opinion, but if you disagree with go fmt or go build, your opinion is wrong.
- art0rz 3y ago
  No. A linter does more than formatting. Besides, some rules may simply not be relevant to what I'm working on while other rules are. Prettier works well enough for most people because it only covers syntax, and not whether or not you can use await in a loop, or should add tracks to your video element, or if jsx should be in scope, etc.
- bsnnkv 3y ago
  This is one of the real productivity superpowers of ecosystems like Go and Rust imo
  - IshKebab 3y ago
    Python and JavaScript have similarly good formatters (as long as your idiot colleagues don't insist on using yapf instead of Black, despite yapf producing non-deterministic output!). In fact I would say Rust is probably behind Prettier in terms of auto formatting. The rustfmt output is less pretty (subjective I know), the devs have made several strange decisions and it seems to be semi-abandoned (maybe partly because the devs were ... shall we say not as friendly and welcoming as the Rust community likes to bleat on about). There are a couple of alternative formatters: * https://github.com/andrewbaxter/genemichaels https://github.com/andrewbaxter/genemichaels * https://github.com/jinxdash/prettier-plugin-rust https://github.com/jinxdash/prettier-plugin-rust Still, all of them are better than clang-format!
brundolf 3y ago
Yeah. There have been lots of Rust or Go linters popping up with impressive benchmarks, but I don't think any will take over the world until they have drop-in parity

by art0rz 3y ago

maccard 3y ago

Would you consider removing your customisations to be closer to the workflows supported by these tools? One of the great things about go is that you're free to have an opinion, but if you disagree with go fmt or go build, your opinion is wrong.

art0rz 3y ago
No. A linter does more than formatting. Besides, some rules may simply not be relevant to what I'm working on while other rules are. Prettier works well enough for most people because it only covers syntax, and not whether or not you can use await in a loop, or should add tracks to your video element, or if jsx should be in scope, etc.
bsnnkv 3y ago
This is one of the real productivity superpowers of ecosystems like Go and Rust imo
- IshKebab 3y ago
  Python and JavaScript have similarly good formatters (as long as your idiot colleagues don't insist on using yapf instead of Black, despite yapf producing non-deterministic output!). In fact I would say Rust is probably behind Prettier in terms of auto formatting. The rustfmt output is less pretty (subjective I know), the devs have made several strange decisions and it seems to be semi-abandoned (maybe partly because the devs were ... shall we say not as friendly and welcoming as the Rust community likes to bleat on about). There are a couple of alternative formatters: * https://github.com/andrewbaxter/genemichaels https://github.com/andrewbaxter/genemichaels * https://github.com/jinxdash/prettier-plugin-rust https://github.com/jinxdash/prettier-plugin-rust Still, all of them are better than clang-format!

brundolf 3y ago

Yeah. There have been lots of Rust or Go linters popping up with impressive benchmarks, but I don't think any will take over the world until they have drop-in parity